Choosing the right paradigm: complex dialogs and control choice
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5127/d512753b6447d9dbc20aa42a59a19c799fb1f80d" alt=""
At work, we make extensive use of Steema TeeChart. TeeChart is a gui component that can render great looking 2d and 3d charts for a variety of applications. We're also exposing its TeeChart Editor in our own gui design applications so users can custom the look and behaviour of such charts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40dc0/40dc0a9efe050fb986cc5e6971e773267a97e352" alt=""
The main problem here is that structured information is badly displayed. The tab pages are confusing and although they are supposedly structured, they do a very bad job at visualizing the customization categories TeeChart offers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a65e/7a65e6e189c7dc717a6c3cd2046bc052b06e6ea8" alt=""
Eclipse goes further by adding hyperlinks within the actual settings view, together with a conventional set of back & forward buttons - which users are very familiar with from the web-browser world. (although they are mis-placed in a non-conventional spot within the actual dialog and look a bit too-different from the common back/forward buttons.)
This goes to show that choosing the proper visualization for even complex data can have a tremendous effect on whether users are able to percieve the information and make good use of the tool.
For further reading (and some good laughs) on Tabbed Dialogs - check The Interface Hall of Shame - Tabbed Dialogs.
Like this article? please Digg it.
<< Home